Hetzner vs UpCloud
Compare these providers side by side, then jump into workload pages where the same pair overlaps on Docker, WordPress, databases, and other specific use cases.
| Feature |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | $4.51/month Best Price | $5.00/month |
| Entry Plan Specs | 2 vCPU 4GB RAM 40GB NVME | 1 vCPU 1GB RAM 25GB NVME |
| CPU Score (Single) | 1,245 Fastest | 1,200 |
| Disk Read Speed | 1,850MB/s Fastest | 1,650MB/s |
| Network Throughput | 9,800Mbps Fastest | 8,500Mbps |
| Boot Time | 18.5seconds Quickest | 22.4seconds |
| Datacenter Regions | 4 locations | 9 locations |
| Hourly Billing | ||
| Support | ticket email phone | ticket email chat |
| Get Started | Visit Hetzner | Visit UpCloud |
Compare These Providers by Workload
Hetzner vs UpCloud for Docker
VPS providers optimized for running Docker containers, with fast storage and good CPU performance.
Open comparison
Hetzner vs UpCloud for Databases
High I/O performance VPS ideal for running PostgreSQL, MySQL, or other databases.
Open comparison
Hetzner vs UpCloud for CI/CD
High-performance VPS for running CI/CD pipelines and build servers.
Open comparison
Hetzner vs UpCloud for Self-Hosting
VPS providers ideal for self-hosting apps like Nextcloud, n8n, and other services.
Open comparison
Hetzner vs UpCloud for Nextcloud
VPS providers with ample storage and good I/O for running Nextcloud.
Open comparison
Analysis
Hetzner
German hosting provider known for exceptional price-to-performance ratio. Popular choice among developers and self-hosters for their reliable infrastructure and transparent pricing.
Starting plan: $4.51/mo
CPU score: 1245
Disk read: 1850 MB/s
UpCloud
Finnish provider focused on performance. Known for their MaxIOPS storage technology and consistent high performance across all server tiers.
Starting plan: $5.00/mo
CPU score: 1200
Disk read: 1650 MB/s
Related Comparisons
FAQ
Which provider is cheaper: Hetzner or UpCloud?
Use the comparison table to check the cheapest entry plans first, then move to the workload-specific pages if you need minimum RAM, CPU, or storage filters.
Should I use the generic comparison or a workload comparison?
Use the generic comparison when you are still narrowing providers down broadly. Use the workload pages once you know the app or use case you care about.
Are these comparisons based on live benchmark data?
They are based on the current repository dataset, with the latest benchmark snapshot dated Mar 2, 2026.