Workload Snapshot: Mar 2, 2026

Contabo vs OVH for Jellyfin

VPS providers with good transcoding performance and storage for running Jellyfin media server. This comparison only looks at the parts of the dataset that matter for Jellyfin workloads.

Quick Verdict

Pick OVH if you want the stronger overall fit.

OVH wins this matchup on the balance of qualifying pricing, CPU, storage, and network data in the current snapshot.

Pick Contabo if one of its tradeoffs matches your priorities.

Contabo may still be the better choice if you care more about its regions, support model, or a specific feature set than the raw benchmark balance.

Cheapest qualifying plan

$8.40

Minimum CPU

2 vCPU

Minimum storage

80 GB

Operating system

Linux

Jellyfin Requirements

Start with at least 4 GB RAM, 2 vCPU, and 80 GB storage. For this workload, Outbound bandwidth matters quickly once multiple users stream at once.

Operating system fit

Linux

Feature
Contabo logo
Contabo
OVH logo
OVH
Starting Price
$10.50/month
$8.40/month
Best Price
Entry Plan Specs
6 vCPU
16GB RAM
100GB NVME
Fits Jellyfin
2 vCPU
4GB RAM
80GB SSD
Fits Jellyfin
CPU Score (Single)
980
1,050
Fastest
Disk Read Speed
420MB/s
450MB/s
Fastest
Network Throughput
2,800Mbps
3,500Mbps
Fastest
Boot Time
55.2seconds
48.3seconds
Quickest
Datacenter Regions6 locations8 locations
Hourly Billing
Support
ticket
email
ticket
email
phone
Get StartedVisit ContaboVisit OVH

Contabo for Jellyfin

Unbeatable prices for storage and RAM Cloud VPS M is the lowest plan that clears the baseline at $10.50.

Unbeatable prices for storage and RAM
Large SSD storage included
Simple flat-rate pricing

OVH for Jellyfin

Large European infrastructure footprint Value is the lowest plan that clears the baseline at $8.40.

Large European infrastructure footprint
Wide range of server options
Strong compliance and certifications

Keep going from here

Jump to the generic provider comparison or load this workload into the VPS selector for a broader recommendation.

FAQ

Which is cheaper for Jellyfin: Contabo or OVH?

Contabo starts at $10.50 for a qualifying plan, while OVH starts at $8.40.

Which provider has better performance for Jellyfin?

Contabo scores 980 on the latest CPU run and OVH scores 1050. Disk and network numbers matter just as much for this workload, so use the full table rather than a single benchmark number.

Do both providers meet the minimum requirements for Jellyfin?

Yes. Both providers have at least one plan that clears the baseline of 4 GB RAM, 2 vCPU, and 80 GB storage.

Should I use the generic Contabo vs OVH comparison instead?

Use this page when Jellyfin is the workload you care about. Use the base comparison page when you want a broader provider-level decision without a workload filter.