Contabo vs Fly.io
Compare these providers side by side, then jump into workload pages where the same pair overlaps on Docker, WordPress, databases, and other specific use cases.
| Feature |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | $5.50/month | $1.94/month Best Price |
| Entry Plan Specs | 4 vCPU 8GB RAM 50GB NVME | 1 vCPU 0.256GB RAM 1GB NVME |
| CPU Score (Single) | 980 | 1,280 Fastest |
| Disk Read Speed | 420MB/s | 1,200MB/s Fastest |
| Network Throughput | 2,800Mbps | 8,000Mbps Fastest |
| Boot Time | 55.2seconds | 8.5seconds Quickest |
| Datacenter Regions | 6 locations | 12 locations |
| Hourly Billing | ||
| Support | ticket email | community email |
| Get Started | Visit Contabo | Visit Fly.io |
Analysis
Contabo
German provider offering the most storage and RAM for the lowest prices. Ideal for storage-heavy workloads and users who prioritize capacity over performance.
Starting plan: $5.50/mo
CPU score: 980
Disk read: 420 MB/s
Fly.io
Modern edge compute platform designed for running apps close to users. Perfect for low-latency applications with their global Anycast network.
Starting plan: $1.94/mo
CPU score: 1280
Disk read: 1200 MB/s
Related Comparisons
FAQ
Which provider is cheaper: Contabo or Fly.io?
Use the comparison table to check the cheapest entry plans first, then move to the workload-specific pages if you need minimum RAM, CPU, or storage filters.
Should I use the generic comparison or a workload comparison?
Use the generic comparison when you are still narrowing providers down broadly. Use the workload pages once you know the app or use case you care about.
Are these comparisons based on live benchmark data?
They are based on the current repository dataset, with the latest benchmark snapshot dated Mar 2, 2026.